POCO F8 Pro cooling test: heat buildup during 30-minute gaming marathon
Evaluating Thermal Stability Under Extended Load
The POCO F8 Pro has generated strong interest among performance-focused users, particularly those who rely on their device for long gaming sessions. One of the most important questions early adopters raise is how well the phone controls heat during extended gameplay. A 30-minute gaming stress test provides meaningful insight into the device’s cooling efficiency, thermal behaviour and overall stability under sustained pressure. Understanding these results helps determine whether the F8 Pro is a reliable option for heavy gamers in the UK and beyond.
During the initial stages of the gaming test, the device maintains a comfortable temperature with little noticeable heat around the frame or back panel. This is expected, as modern chipsets typically handle short bursts of load with ease. The high refresh rate display remains smooth, and gameplay feels consistent without any early signs of throttling. For users who engage in shorter gaming bursts, the cooling system appears more than capable of keeping temperatures controlled.
As the test progresses past the 10-minute mark, the temperature begins to rise gradually, particularly near the camera module and the upper rear section of the device. This is a common hotspot area due to chipset placement. The F8 Pro’s cooling system appears to distribute heat evenly, preventing sudden spikes that can disrupt performance. Frame rates stay stable across graphically intensive scenes, indicating that the thermal design is still functioning effectively at this stage.

By the 20-minute point, heat levels become more noticeable, especially when playing demanding titles. The phone grows warm to the touch but does not reach uncomfortable levels. The device remains fully capable of maintaining its performance targets without visible slowdown. This suggests that the cooling system is working as intended, managing heat spread efficiently rather than allowing a concentrated buildup in a single area.
Entering the final phase of the 30-minute marathon, the F8 Pro reaches its peak operating temperature for the session. While the phone becomes warm, it avoids entering the overheating zone where performance degradation would typically occur. Frame rates stay mostly stable with only minor dips, likely due to natural thermal regulation rather than aggressive throttling. This behaviour indicates a well-optimised balance between performance and cooling that benefits long-distance gaming runs.
The chassis temperature does rise during the final minutes, but it remains tolerable for users holding the phone without a case. Using a thin protective cover helps further reduce the sensation of warmth. Compared with devices that experience severe heat concentration or sudden drops in performance, the F8 Pro performs admirably for its category. The sustained stability during the test shows that the device prioritises consistency, making it suitable for gaming sessions without forcing the user to pause due to heat.
In everyday gaming scenarios, this performance suggests the F8 Pro will satisfy both casual and dedicated gamers. Titles that rely heavily on graphics maintain smooth responsiveness, while lighter games produce very little heat at all. For users who combine gaming with other resource-heavy tasks like multitasking or video streaming, the cooling system demonstrates enough headroom to manage fluctuating loads effectively.
It is worth noting that environmental conditions influence thermal behaviour. Warmer indoor temperatures can accelerate heat buildup, while cooler climates or active ventilation help stabilise the device more quickly. UK users, who often experience mild conditions, may find the phone performs slightly better in real-world use than the controlled test environment suggests. This makes the F8 Pro a dependable option for gaming throughout the year.
Battery performance during the thermal test remains relatively steady, though higher heat levels naturally increase power consumption. Even as the device warms, power efficiency does not appear to degrade dramatically. The combination of stable thermals and controlled battery usage indicates that the phone is optimised to handle demanding operations without sacrificing longevity or user comfort. This benefits those who regularly play games away from charging points.
The F8 Pro’s cooling system appears to strike a good balance between hardware capability and thermal regulation. Heat is present during extended runs, but it is spread across the device rather than concentrated, preventing sudden discomfort or unexpected performance drops. For a device positioned as a value-performance model rather than a dedicated gaming phone, this result is encouraging and places it favourably against many competitors in its price range.
In conclusion, the POCO F8 Pro performs reliably in a 30-minute gaming marathon, demonstrating controlled heat levels and stable performance throughout the session. While warmth becomes noticeable in the upper rear section, it does not escalate to problematic levels. For gamers seeking a balance of performance, affordability and thermal stability, the F8 Pro proves to be a strong option that can comfortably handle extended gameplay without compromising user experience.
